What is more, you certainly want high availability storage for your virtual servers – but you lack the budget and room for a physical SAN system. You have disk capacity in your servers running VMware. Why not take advantage of it?
Now you have options – with a virtual SAN appliance ideally suited for midsized businesses or remote and branch office use.
The nodes can be clustered together to transform your existing server storage into a clustered storage system that you manage as a single virtual SAN supporting VMware. With this configuration, you can take full advantage of VMware vSphere advanced features – including high availability, VMotion, Distributed Resource Scheduler and Site Recovery Manager.
As you need to, you can scale without disruption by adding additional storage nodes. The P4000 VSA is a full-featured SAN with all the bells and whistles. You reap all the benefits, while keeping costs low and footprint small.
And what does VMware think about the P4000 VSA? The company recognises VSA as a certified SAN storage device for VMware and lists it in the VMware SAN/Storage Compatibility Guide.
If you are looking to bring high availability to a remote site or branch office, the P4000 VSA is the ideal choice when you:
Of course, the P4000 VSA may not always be the right virtualised storage solution for your environment. You’ll need to evaluate your needs and criteria before making a final choice. For example, you’ll want to consider the VSA if you have one or two, maybe as many as four, VMware servers running virtual machines on each.
If you have more VMware servers than that, you should consider the HP LeftHand P4000 SAN or an HP StorageWorks Fibre Channel-based SAN solution. Either would be a logical choice when it comes to price, performance, scalability and manageability.
'I installed VMware Infrastructure 3 in 20 minutes, the HP LeftHand Virtual SAN Appliance in another 20 minutes, and had an enterprise-class disaster recovery solution up and running in less than an hour,' says Koie Smith, IT administrator.
As a result, the law firm saved US$100,000 in hardware costs, shaved hours off IT administration time and avoided heavy implementation expenses.
