Jump to content WorldWide-English
HP.com Home Products and Services Support and Drivers Solutions How to Buy
» Contact HP
HP.com Home

The Real Story about Dell and blades

» 

Large Enterprise Business

» Products
» Business & IT Services
» Solutions
» Technologies
» Partners
» Support & Drivers
» Business Technology
» Media & Library
» Support & Troubleshooting
» Software & Drivers
Putting Dell's claims to the test - The Real Story
Content starts here
supporting imageApril 2009. Dell’s third attempt at blades, the PowerEdge M1000e was introduced in January 2008 with Dell a distant 3rd in the blade market. Dell’s marketing has been trying to emphasize their competitiveness with blades, but do the facts support such boasts?

We wondered, “In the year that has passed since Dell introduced their new blade has their competitive position changed much?” Take a look at the facts :



 

»  The Real Story home page
»  Real Story about Dell and Boxes
»  Real Story about Dell's Flex Address

Fact 1: Since Dell introduced their new blades, their worldwide blade server unit market is virtually unchanged (CY2007 to CY2008), gaining just 0.5 points year over year. During the same time period HP gained ten times the unit share, 5.1 points.1

Dell continues to be a distant third in the blade market.
Blade server worldwide unit share:
  CY 2007 CY2008 YOY change
(points)
Dell 9.0% (#3) 9.5% (#3) 0.5
HP 45.5% (#1) 50.6% (#1) 5.1 (10x)

Source IDC Worldwide Quarterly Server Tracker, February 2009
For every 5 blades servers HP shipped in CY2008, Dell shipped 1.2

Fact 2: Large memory footprints, reduction of physical server sprawl, and recapturing unutilized server capacity are critical for virtualization. Dell blades can’t match HP in this area.

  • The HP ProLiant BL490c G6 server blade delivers the same capacity for virtual machines in half the space as the Dell M710:
Infrastructure delivered in the same 10U enclosure size:
  processors DIMMs NICs
Dell M7103 16 144 32
HP BL490c G64 32 288 128

HP ProLiant BL685c G6 blade server delivers 33% more DIMM and max memory capacity than the Dell M905 blade server:

Max memory:
  DIMMs Max Memory Advantage HP
Dell M9055 24 192 GB 33%
HP BL685 G66 32 256 GB 33%

While Dell’s M905 has 24 DIMM sockets, a closer look at the system board reveals that two processors have 8 DIMM sockets each and the other two have 4 DIMM sockets each. VMware’s best practice guidelines advise customers that to avoid performance degradation, “The host hardware should be configured so that physical host memory is evenly balanced across NUMA nodes.” 7

Therefore, Dell M905 customers who wish to adhere to VMware’s best practices will only be able to use 16 of the 24 DIMM sockets.

Fact 3: Dell’s FlexAddress doesn’t compare to HP’s Virtual Connect.

When we at HP developed Virtual Connect, we were really thinking of how to simplify the way customers connect their servers to LANs and SANs. HP’s Virtual Connect makes the server administrator self-sufficient while Dell’s FlexAddress falls short by still requiring LAN or SAN admin assistance to move server workloads.8

    HP Virtual Connect reduces cables without adding switches to manage.
    Dell’s FlexAddress requires pass-thru modules (and all their additional cables) or switches (and all their management effort).

    HP’s Virtual Connect makes the server administrator self-sufficient by allowing the complete LAN and SAN connection information and physical connections to be moved with the workload9 from one server bay to another without impacting the LAN or SAN.

    Dell FlexAddress falls way short of the capabilities delivered by HP’s Virtual Connect by simply attaching a MAC address or World Wide Name to a single server bay. Server, LAN and SAN admins still must all coordinate their efforts to move a server workload in the traditional, time-consuming, inefficient way.

    Virtual Connect Flex-10 Ethernet module which can allocate the bandwidth of a 10Gb Ethernet network port across four network interface card (NIC) connections. This delivers up to 8 embedded FlexNICs in a HP PoLiant BL490c G6 blade server, for example, versus only four embedded and less flexible NICs in the Dell PowerEdge M710 blade server.



Fact 4: Dell’s blade portfolio includes one blade enclosure and a few x86 server blades. HP delivers an entire portfolio of enclosures, server and workstation blades, storage and expansion blades, and more that lets you match the unique needs of environments from small remote sites to large, mission-critical datacenters.10

HP knows blades are not a one-size fits all and offers a wide portfolio of bladed offerings, offering real customer choice.

  • Two enclosures to match the unique needs of large (c7000) or small/medium  IT (c3000) environments- HP has this, Dell does not
  • ½ height blade with 18 DIMMS & Intel Xeon 5500 processors- HP has this, Dell does not
  • Storage blades – HP has these, Dell does not
  • Workstation blades – HP has these, Dell does not
  • Two-servers-in one blade - HP has these, Dell does not
  • NonStop Blades - HP has these, Dell does not
  • Integrity Blades with mission critical HP-UX - HP has these, Dell does not

HP’s blade everything strategy means that customers can get the time, energy and cost savings BladeSystem offers for more of their IT infrastructure.  They can have a simpler, more consistent way to deploy, maintain, manage and service their infrastructure.


Fact 5: HP BladeSystem Solution Builder Program represents the industry’s largest ecosystem focused on blade solutions. What does Dell offer?

The HP BladeSystem Solution Builder Program is a global community of technology and service delivery providers who collaborate with HP and with one another to define, develop, deliver and deploy customer solutions built for HP BladeSystem.

See the HP BladeSystem Solution Builder Program at  www.hp.com/go/solutionbuilder

And the online worldwide community for HP blades, the HP Blade Connect www.hp.com/go/bladeconnect

Bottomline:  While Dell’s marketing is trying to emphasize that it is more competitive in the blade arena their market position hasn’t really changed since they introduced their new blade system last year.

With the innovative HP BladeSystem c-Class HP is setting the agenda in the blade market.  We are leading. Dell and others are reacting to HP’s leadership and innovation. But marketing can’t substitute for real innovation

To learn more about the HP BladeSystem see: http://www.hp.com/go/bladesystem



1 IDC Worldwide Quarterly Server Tracker, February 2009

2 IDC Worldwide Quarterly Server Tracker, February 2009, CY2008 blade units, HP 552,317. Dell 104,020 is a 5.3 to 1 ratio.

3Dell M710 details: http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/server-poweredge-m710?c=us&cs=555&l=en&s=biz

4 BL490c details: http://h18000.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliant-bl/c-class/490c-g6/specifications.html

5 Dell M905 details: http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/server-poweredge-m905?c=us&cs=555&l=en&s=biz

6 BL685 details: http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/nz/en/sm/WF05a/3709945-3709945-3328410-3722793-3722793-3896111.html

7http://pubs.vmware.com/vi35/resmgmt/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=resmgmt&file=vc_best_practice.13.8.html

8 See the HP blog “Why we created Virtual Connect”
http://www.communities.hp.com/online/blogs/eyeonblades/archive/2008/07/02/Why-we-created-Virtual-Connect.aspx

9 Server workload: the entire software stack of operating system, tools, and business application running on a server

10 Dell’s blade portfolio: http://www.dell.com/content/products/compare.aspx/blade?c=us&l=en&s=biz

Intel®, Itanium® and Xeon® are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and other countries.
AMD Opteron is a trademark of Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Printable version
Privacy statement Using this site means you accept its terms
© 2009 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.